Throughout the centuries, Robin Hood has worn a number of completely different hats-a commoner’s, a nobleman’s, an insurrectionist’s, a loyalist’s, a thief’s, a hero’s. So perhaps it is not so shocking that this film has numerous completely different faces to speak about.
Robin Hood, as a straight-up adventure movie, is a bit disappointing. Director Ridley Scott appeared not sure whether he wanted to make a Braveheart-model epic or a salty summer time popcorn flick-so the result is a mangled mesh into which both are woven. It’s got a great deal of content, too-sufficient to make it a fairly exhausting PG-13 movie.
However I wish to go only a contact deeper and look at the character of Robin Hood himself. As a result of, actually, this beloved antihero should stir numerous questions in our hearts. Robin Hood is clearly a paradox-a hero who’s a villain, a charitable soul who steals. We’re requested to forgive his unhealthy behavior because of his good intentions and, because the man’s been round so long, we do are likely to forgive him-whether or not we should or not.
His new incarnation is not a lot a dapper thief as a nationwide revolutionary-a champion of restricted government and bureaucratic restraint. Robin would inform us that when rules are unjust, it is our responsibility to interrupt them. And quite a lot of Individuals would agree. After all, our whole country was based on simply such lawbreaking and rebellion.
Still, it’s good for us to treat such ideas, irrespective of how they resonate, with a specific amount of caution. And in that, Robin Hood-often despite itself-is a good reminder of one vital factor: Simply because one thing feels right, it would not necessarily comply with that it is.
